Indiana Supreme Court· 11/8/2000
Ben-Yisrayl v. State
Citations
- 738 N.E.2d 253
- 2000 Ind. LEXIS 1081
- 2000 WL 1678979
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that, as a general rule, when a court decides an issue on direct appeal, the doctrine of res judicata applies, thereby precluding its review in post-conviction proceedings
- explaining that when an Court of Appeals of Indiana | Memorandum Decision 49A02-1710-PC-2326 | April 24, 2019 Page 15 of 17 appellate court decides an issue on direct appeal, the doctrine of res judicata precludes its review in post-conviction proceedings
- because post-conviction proceedings are civil proceedings, petitioner bears burden of establishing grounds for relief by preponderance of evidence
- once a petitioner raises a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel on direct appeal, he is precluded from raising ineffective assistance of trial counsel in a petition for post-conviction relief
- codified at Ind. Crim. Rule 24(B)(3)(b)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Dickson, Shepard, Sullivan, Boehm, Rucker
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
155 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Timberlake v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 2001-08-20· cited 787×
- Pruitt v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 2009-03-31· cited 450×
- Fisher v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 2004-06-17· cited 377×
- Henley v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 2008-02-27· cited 290×
- McCary v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 2002-01-18· cited 268×
- Reed v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 2006-11-15· cited 249×
- Juan M. Garrett v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court· 2013-08-28· cited 179×
- Allen v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 2001-06-29· cited 137×
- Stephenson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 2007-04-26· cited 124×
- Dewitt v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 2001-09-13· cited 118×
- Overstreet v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 2007-11-27· cited 112×
- Daniel Ray Wilkes v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court· 2013-04-04· cited 83×
- Hampton v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 2012-02-14· cited 80×
- Tapia v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 2001-08-20· cited 68×
- Reed v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 2007-05-22· cited 52×
- State v. BrunnerIndiana Supreme Court· 2011-05-26· cited 39×
- Duane Turner v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals· 2012-09-19· cited 35×
- Walker v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2006-02-28· cited 34×
- Wieland v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2006-06-05· cited 34×
- Sims v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2002-07-18· cited 30×
Cites
44 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court· 1963-05-13· cited 33,902×
- Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court· 2000-04-18· cited 15,929×
- United States v. BagleySupreme Court· 1985-07-02· cited 8,539×
- United States v. AgursSupreme Court· 1976-06-24· cited 6,537×
- Evitts v. LuceySupreme Court· 1985-03-18· cited 3,068×
- Roe v. Flores-OrtegaSupreme Court· 2000-02-23· cited 2,810×
- State v. Van CleaveIndiana Supreme Court· 1996-12-19· cited 447×
- Bieghler v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1997-12-18· cited 316×
- Woods v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1998-11-23· cited 285×
- Weatherford v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1993-08-31· cited 251×
- Langley v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1971-03-22· cited 159×
- Lowery v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1994-10-04· cited 141×
- Spranger v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1995-05-24· cited 140×
- Bailey v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1985-01-25· cited 134×
- Ronald Mason v. Craig A. HanksSeventh Circuit· 1996-08-27· cited 123×
- Conner v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1999-05-25· cited 123×
- Sweeney v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1998-12-18· cited 114×
- Taylor v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1999-10-01· cited 101×
- Estate of Reasor v. Putnam CountyIndiana Supreme Court· 1994-05-27· cited 90×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.