Skip to main content

Martinez v. State

Citations

  • 924 S.W.2d 693
  • 1996 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 70
  • 1996 WL 269204

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that jury charge tracking 2 The definition of “drug” in the jury charge tracks the definition found in the Texas Controlled Substances Act, where “drug” is defined as “a substance, other than a device or a component, part, or accessory of a device, that is: (A
  • “Following the law as it is set out by the Texas Legislature will not be deemed error on the part of a trial judge.” (citing Riddle v. State, 888 S.W.2d 1, 8 (Tex. Crim. App. 1994)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Meyers, Baird, Maloney, Clinton, Overstreet

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

144 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

54 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.