Skip to main content

Smith v. State

Citations

  • 297 S.W.3d 260
  • 2009 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 527
  • 2009 WL 1212500

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that jurors are presumed to attach common understanding of meaning of terms that are not defined in jury charge
  • concluding appellant’s substantial rights not harmed where record clearly showed appellant had actual notice of capital charge upon which State was basing allegations
  • determining that defendant was not harmed where record showed that he “had actual notice of the capital charge upon which the State was basing its allegations”
  • stating that the indictment must be specific enough to inform the defendant of the nature of the accusations against him so that he may prepare a defense.
  • holding words not statutorily defined are given their usual meaning
  • “This 22 Court has long held that murder is a lesser-included offense of capital murder.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Meyers, Keasler, Keller, Hervey, Holcomb, Cochran, Price, Womack, Johnson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

112 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

48 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.