Skip to main content

Anderson v. State

Citations

  • 932 S.W.2d 502
  • 1996 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 193
  • 1996 WL 512397

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that capital punishment is neither cruel nor unusual for purposes of the Texas Constitution
  • holding that capital punishment is neither cruel nor unusual for purposes of Texas Constitution
  • explaining that “only exception” to adverse-ruling requirement “occurs if an instruction to disregard would not have cured the harm”
  • holding evidence obtained pursuant to legal arrest was not fruit of illegal arrest
  • holding evidence obtained pursuant to legal arrest was not fruit of illegal arrest
  • holding evidence obtained pursuant to legal arrest was not fruit of illegal arrest

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Keller, Baird, Overstreet, Clinton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

107 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

55 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.