Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 9/11/1996
Anderson v. State
Citations
- 932 S.W.2d 502
- 1996 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 193
- 1996 WL 512397
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that capital punishment is neither cruel nor unusual for purposes of the Texas Constitution
- holding that capital punishment is neither cruel nor unusual for purposes of Texas Constitution
- explaining that “only exception” to adverse-ruling requirement “occurs if an instruction to disregard would not have cured the harm”
- holding evidence obtained pursuant to legal arrest was not fruit of illegal arrest
- holding evidence obtained pursuant to legal arrest was not fruit of illegal arrest
- holding evidence obtained pursuant to legal arrest was not fruit of illegal arrest
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Keller, Baird, Overstreet, Clinton
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
107 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Mosley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1998-07-01· cited 2,969×
- Ladd v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1999-10-06· cited 1,900×
- Williams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1997-01-29· cited 954×
- State v. BallardCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1999-02-24· cited 884×
- Coble v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2010-10-13· cited 848×
- Posey v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1998-03-25· cited 696×
- Moore v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1999-04-21· cited 684×
- Prystash v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1999-09-15· cited 668×
- Cantu v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1997-01-29· cited 612×
- Estrada v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2010-06-16· cited 582×
- Swain v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2005-11-02· cited 471×
- Davis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2010-06-16· cited 441×
- Hughes v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2000-04-12· cited 278×
- Jackson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1999-04-28· cited 276×
- McGinn v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1998-01-21· cited 216×
- Busby v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1999-03-31· cited 183×
- Josey v. StateTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 1998-10-22· cited 177×
- State v. KleypasSupreme Court of Kansas· 2001-12-28· cited 144×
- Miller v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2006-06-08· cited 70×
- Bradley v. StateTex. App. Ct., 8th Dist. (El Paso)· 1997-10-08· cited 69×
Cites
55 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court· 1970-05-18· cited 11,712×
- Gregg v. GeorgiaSupreme Court· 1976-07-22· cited 7,936×
- United States v. MendenhallSupreme Court· 1980-06-30· cited 6,313×
- Furman v. GeorgiaSupreme Court· 1972-06-29· cited 5,066×
- Florida v. BostickSupreme Court· 1991-06-20· cited 4,435×
- California v. Hodari D.Supreme Court· 1991-04-23· cited 3,670×
- Woodson v. North CarolinaSupreme Court· 1976-07-02· cited 2,907×
- Stansbury v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1994-04-26· cited 2,603×
- Pulley v. HarrisSupreme Court· 1984-01-23· cited 2,080×
- Jurek v. TexasSupreme Court· 1976-07-02· cited 2,034×
- Gardner v. FloridaSupreme Court· 1977-03-22· cited 1,935×
- McFarland v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1996-02-21· cited 1,746×
- Simmons v. South CarolinaSupreme Court· 1994-06-17· cited 1,326×
- Muniz v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1993-01-06· cited 1,228×
- Tuilaepa v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1994-06-30· cited 983×
- David W. McKay v. TexasSupreme Court· 1986-10-06· cited 757×
- Broxton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1995-10-04· cited 738×
- New York v. HarrisSupreme Court· 1990-04-18· cited 658×
- Barnes v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1994-02-09· cited 623×
- Harris v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1992-04-22· cited 568×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.