Fifth Circuit· 7/20/2001

Martinez v. Johnson

Citations

255 F.3d 229
2001 WL 704793

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

“We find that the [TCCA] was not objectively unreasonably in its application of the Jackson standard.”
“[T]he Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments impose a constitutional floor on the sufficiency of evidence required to sustain the jury's verdict on the special issue of future dangerousness.” (emphasis added)
“In a habeas corpus appeal, we review the district court’s . . . conclusions of law de novo, applying the same standard of review to the state court’s decision as the district court.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: King, Chief-Judge, Jones, Stewart

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

71 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

43 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Martinez v. Johnson

11 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.