Skip to main content
· 12/2/1999

Roise v. State

Citations

  • 7 S.W.3d 225
  • 1999 WL 996773

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that the phrase “lewd exhibition of genitals” has not been statutorily defined and the trial court was not required to define the phrase for the jury; there is no statement that if a word or term is defined in a statute, that statutory definition must be submitted to the jury
  • “The simultaneous possession of each item of child pornography constitutes a separate offense or an allowable unit of prosecution.”
  • no definitional instruction was required for word “presence” as it had not been administratively or legislatively defined

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Justices Kidd, Patterson and Onion

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.