Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 6/11/2014

Garza v. State

Citations

435 S.W.3d 258
2014 WL 2589770
2014 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 822

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

noting that “even constitutional errors . . . may be forfeited on appeal if an appellant failed to object at trial”
explaining that “all errors—even constitutional errors—may be forfeited on appeal if an appellant failed to object at trial”
discussing the different “categories” of rights according to Marin v. State, 851 S.W.2d 275, 278–80 (Tex. Crim. App. 1993), overruled in part on other grounds by Cain v. State, 947 S.W.2d 262 (Tex. Crim. App. 1997
\[T]his case does not require that we further define where in Marin 's categorical structure [this] claim is properly placed. We reserve such a decision for a matter that properly presents the issue.\
“even constitutional errors—may be forfeited on appeal if an appellant failed to object at trial”
“even constitutional errors—may be forfeited on appeal if an appellant failed to object at trial”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Alcala, Cochran, Heryey, Johnson, Keasler, Keller, Meyers, Price, Womack

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

77 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

89 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.