Gipson, Raimond Kevon

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• relying on quote cited above in reversing case in which appellate court had not addressed the State’s procedural challenge before reversing the case on sufficiency grounds
• remanding case to court of appeals to decide whether pleading true to revocation motion which asserted a failure to pay a fine, waived statutory and constitutional ability-to-pay protections
• remanding case to court of appeals for determination regarding whether appellant waived right to raise on appeal issue regarding inability to pay fees and costs by pleading true in revocation proceeding to allegation that fees were unpaid
• remanding to court of appeals to determine “whether, by pleading true to an allegation that he failed to pay and by failing to assert his inability to pay, a defendant waives or forfeits a claim that he is unable to pay”
• revocation for failure to pay fines without considering the reasons for the probationer’s inability to pay or alternative measures would violate the United States Constitution
• revocation for failure to pay fines without considering the reasons for the probationer’s inability to pay or alternative measures would violate the U.S. Constitution

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).