Skip to main content

Lackey v. State

Citations

  • 364 S.W.3d 837
  • 2012 WL 716023
  • 2012 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 476

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that Appellant properly preserved his objection to the lack of authority of an appointed municipal court judge
  • stating that a party should object as soon as that party knows or should know that an error has occurred
  • stating that a party should object as soon as that party knows or should know that an error has occurred
  • observing that it was \at least arguable\ that, even though the appellant did not object at the hearing, the trial judge \had no authority even to rule that he had no authority\
  • stating that an objection to the authority of the judicial officer presiding over a proceeding must be timed to afford \notice of the procedural irregularity and an adequate opportunity to take appropriate corrective action\
  • stating that an objection must be made as soon as the grounds become apparent

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Price, Hervey, Womack, Johnson, Cochran, Alcala, Keller, Meyers, Keasler

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

56 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

32 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.