Skip to main content

Rogers v. State

Citations

  • 991 S.W.2d 263
  • 1999 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 30
  • 1999 WL 187085

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that evidence of defendant’s prior sentences was relevant to the jury’s determination of the proper sentence in the present case
  • holding that sentences assessed for prior convictions are relevant to the jury’s determination of the appropriate sentence
  • holding that evidence of defendant’s prior sentences was relevant to the jury’s determination of the proper sentence in the present case
  • holding that prior convictions are relevant to the determination of the appropriate sentence
  • holding that prior convictions are relevant to the determination of the appropriate sentence
  • noting that the traditional definition of relevance under Evidence Rule 401 is not a A perfect fit @ within the punishment context

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Womack

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

334 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.