Skip to main content

Mays v. State

Citations

  • 318 S.W.3d 368
  • 2010 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 480
  • 2010 WL 1687779

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that it was not an abuse of discretion for the trial to refuse to poll the jurors about their potential exposure to media coverage of the case
  • holding that a defendant’s failure to specify the facts or legal theory supporting the submission of a defense forfeits the error on appeal
  • concluding that appellant failed to preserve his complaints about “a series of egregiously improper remarks” by not objecting to those arguments at trial
  • concluding that appellant failed to preserve his complaints about “a series of egregiously improper remarks” by not objecting to those arguments at trial
  • concluding that appellant failed to preserve his complaints about “a series of egregiously improper remarks” by not objecting to those arguments at trial
  • concluding that appellant failed to preserve his complaints about “a series of egregiously improper remarks” by not objecting to those arguments at trial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cochran

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

300 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

94 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.