Skip to main content

Ellison v. State

Citations

  • 201 S.W.3d 714
  • 2006 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1689
  • 2006 WL 2620094

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a defendant’s suitability for community supervision is a matter “relevant to sentencing” under article 37.07, section 3(a)
  • holding that a defendant = s suitability for community supervision is a matter A relevant to sentencing @ under article 37.07, section 3(a)
  • holding that probation officer’s testimony regarding defendant’s suitability for probation was relevant to sentencing pursuant to Article 37.07, § 3(a)(1)
  • holding that probation officer, based on her “training and education,” was qualified to give expert opinion about defendant’s suitability for probation
  • noting article 37.07 allows “a jury to consider a wide range of evidence in determining” punishment
  • discussing rule 401's definition of \relevant\ evidence and holding that in determining admissibility of punishment evidence, \a trial judge must operate within the bounds of\ rules 401, 402, and 403

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Keasler

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

176 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.