Fields v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the statute requires that the evidence may not be considered in assessing punishment until the factfinder is satisfied beyond reasonable doubt that these acts “are attributable to the defendant”
• concluding that the failure to limit mental states constitutes error; however, the error was harmless
• holding that the statute requires that the evidence may not be considered in assessing punishment until the factfinder is satisfied beyond reasonable doubt that these acts “are attributable to the defendant”
• holding that the statute requires that the evidence may not be considered in assessing punishment until the factfinder is satisfied beyond reasonable doubt that these acts \are attributable to the defendant\
• holding that the statute requires that the evidence may not be considered in assessing punishment until the factfinder is satisfied beyond reasonable doubt that these acts \are attributable to the defendant\
• holding that article 37.07 requires that extraneous offense evidence “may not be considered in assessing punishment until the fact-finder is satisfied beyond a reasonable doubt that these prior acts are attributable to the defendant”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

138 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Delgado v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2007-09-26· cited 707×
• Haley v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2005-10-05· cited 573×
• Huizar v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2000-02-23· cited 526×
• Ex Parte Taylor
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2001-02-28· cited 211×
• Harnett v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2000-11-16· cited 186×
• In re C.J.H.
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 2002-06-13· cited 148×
• Cate v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 7th Dist. (Amarillo)· 2004-01-09· cited 119×
• Chapman v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2004-10-21· cited 110×
• Franklin v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2000-02-16· cited 106×
• Allen v. State
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 2001-08-01· cited 77×
• Malpica v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 12th Dist. (Tyler)· 2003-04-30· cited 65×
• Arthur v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2000-01-13· cited 62×
• Autry v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 2000-07-26· cited 58×
• Thomas v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2010-04-14· cited 37×
• Moore v. State
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 2005-04-28· cited 34×
• Ray v. State
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 2003-10-02· cited 30×
• Green v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 2002-03-20· cited 27×
• Rodgers v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 10th Dist. (Waco)· 2005-10-26· cited 26×
• Martin v. State
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 2001-02-22· cited 26×
• Batiste v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 2002-02-20· cited 26×

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• In Re WINSHIP
  Supreme Court· 1970-05-18· cited 11,712×
• Geesa v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1991-11-06· cited 2,157×
• McMillan v. Pennsylvania
  Supreme Court· 1986-06-19· cited 1,908×
• Fields v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 1998-03-25· cited 37×