Skip to main content

Martinez v. State

Citations

  • 22 S.W.3d 504
  • 2000 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 74
  • 2000 WL 826986

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the reason for a timely objection is to “give to the trial court or the opposing party the opportunity to correct the error or remove the basis for the objection”
  • explaining that preservation of error is a systemic requirement that this court should review on its own motion
  • explaining that preservation of error is a systemic requirement that this court should review on its own motion
  • stating that a timely objection gives the trial court or the opposing party the opportunity to correct the error or remove the basis for the objection
  • stating that a timely objection gives the trial court or the opposing party the opportunity to correct the error or remove the basis for the objection
  • stating that a timely objection gives the trial court or the opposing party the opportunity to correct the error or remove the basis for the objection

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Keasler, Womack, Mansfield, Johnson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

174 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.