Skip to main content

Curry v. State

Citations

  • 30 S.W.3d 394
  • 2000 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 87
  • 2000 WL 1347986

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that sufficiency of evidence must be weighed against “manner and means of abduction” alleged in indictment
  • holding that sufficiency of evidence must be weighed against “manner and Clinton—6 means of abduction” alleged in indictment
  • concluding that because the indictment’s amendment was erroneous, the hypothetically correct jury charge must be based on the original indictment
  • holding that sufficiency of evidence must be weighed against \manner and means of abduction\ alleged in indictment
  • holding that a hypothetically correct jury charge must set forth “the statutory elements of the offense . . . as modified by the charging instrument”
  • holding that suf- ficiency of evidence must be weighed against “manner and means of ab- duction” alleged in indictment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Keasler, McCormick, Mansfield, Keller, Price, Holland, Womack, Johnson, Meyers

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

1,429 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

53 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Curry v. State

299 other CourtListener records share this case name; the 50 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.