Skip to main content

Curry v. State

Citations

  • 643 N.E.2d 963
  • 1994 Ind. App. LEXIS 1683
  • 1994 WL 686794

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • defining material evidence as that which would have a reasonable probability of changing the outcome
  • only statements which are testimonial in nature and elicited during custodial interrogation must be suppressed
  • to meet the standard of constitutional materiality, the evidence must both possess an exeul-patory value that was apparent before the evidence was destroyed, and be of such a nature that the defendant would be unable to obtain comparable evidence by other reasonable means
  • to meet the standard of constitutional materiality, the evidence must both possess an exculpatory value that was apparent before the evidence was destroyed, and be of such a nature that the defendant would be unable to obtain comparable evidence by other reasonable means

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Robertson, Sharpnack, Rucker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

25 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

46 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.