Indiana Court of Appeals· 12/8/1994
Curry v. State
Citations
- 643 N.E.2d 963
- 1994 Ind. App. LEXIS 1683
- 1994 WL 686794
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- defining material evidence as that which would have a reasonable probability of changing the outcome
- only statements which are testimonial in nature and elicited during custodial interrogation must be suppressed
- to meet the standard of constitutional materiality, the evidence must both possess an exeul-patory value that was apparent before the evidence was destroyed, and be of such a nature that the defendant would be unable to obtain comparable evidence by other reasonable means
- to meet the standard of constitutional materiality, the evidence must both possess an exculpatory value that was apparent before the evidence was destroyed, and be of such a nature that the defendant would be unable to obtain comparable evidence by other reasonable means
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Robertson, Sharpnack, Rucker
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
25 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Walker v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2010-08-17· cited 72×
- Gibson v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2000-07-31· cited 70×
- Wright v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2002-04-29· cited 44×
- Bartlett v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1999-05-20· cited 37×
- State v. KellerIndiana Court of Appeals· 2006-04-10· cited 30×
- Redman v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 1997-05-06· cited 27×
- Channell v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 1995-11-30· cited 24×
- State v. AynesIndiana Court of Appeals· 1999-08-31· cited 23×
- State v. LinckIndiana Court of Appeals· 1999-06-08· cited 21×
- Joseph Matheny v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals· 2013-03-07· cited 21×
- Samek v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 1997-12-10· cited 19×
- Long v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 1997-05-13· cited 15×
- Neville v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 1996-03-19· cited 14×
- Green v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 1995-03-16· cited 14×
- Volpi v. StateWyoming Supreme Court· 2018-06-14· cited 12×
- Smith v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2005-06-09· cited 11×
- Rita v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 1996-04-18· cited 10×
- Samaniego v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 1997-05-12· cited 10×
- Pennycuff v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2000-04-26· cited 6×
- Michael P. Penrod v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court· 2004-06-17· cited 4×
Cites
46 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
- United States v. BagleySupreme Court· 1985-07-02· cited 8,539×
- Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1925-11-26· cited 7,454×
- Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1981-06-22· cited 6,931×
- Rhode Island v. InnisSupreme Court· 1980-05-12· cited 5,571×
- Chambers v. MaroneySupreme Court· 1970-10-12· cited 4,391×
- United States v. RossSupreme Court· 1982-06-01· cited 3,985×
- Pennsylvania v. FinleySupreme Court· 1987-05-18· cited 3,807×
- California v. TrombettaSupreme Court· 1984-06-11· cited 3,405×
- Arizona v. YoungbloodSupreme Court· 1989-01-23· cited 3,366×
- Kirby v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1972-06-07· cited 3,001×
- McNeil v. WisconsinSupreme Court· 1991-06-13· cited 1,818×
- Michigan v. JacksonSupreme Court· 1986-04-01· cited 1,418×
- California v. CarneySupreme Court· 1985-05-13· cited 1,276×
- South Dakota v. NevilleSupreme Court· 1983-02-22· cited 1,275×
- United States v. GouveiaSupreme Court· 1984-05-29· cited 1,098×
- Pennsylvania v. MunizSupreme Court· 1990-06-18· cited 976×
- United States v. JohnsSupreme Court· 1985-01-21· cited 515×
- Texas v. WhiteSupreme Court· 1975-12-01· cited 409×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.