Skip to main content

Curry v. State

Citations

  • 291 Ga. 446
  • 729 S.E.2d 370
  • 2012 Fulton County D. Rep. 2176
  • 2012 WL 2681371
  • 2012 Ga. LEXIS 672

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Evidence that merely casts a bare suspicion on another or ‘raise(s) a conjectural inference as to the commission of the crime by another is not admissible. (Cits.)’ [Cit.]”
  • permissible to ask defendant who did not invoke right to remain silent why he failed to respond to particular questions during interview
  • defendant did not invoke right to remain silent during interview and thus testimony regarding his failure to respond to particular questions was admissible
  • permissible to ask defendant who did not invoke right to remain silent why he failed to respond to particular questions during interview
  • defendant did not invoke right to remain silent during interview and thus testimony regarding his failure to respond to particular questions was admissible
  • “As Curry did not invoke his right to remain silent during the interview, the testimony regarding Curry’s failure to respond to [particular] questions [while providing his statement] was admissible.” (citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hines

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

21 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

25 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.