Skip to main content

Ferguson v. State

Citations

  • 622 S.W.2d 846
  • 1981 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1148

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding defendant may not be left to guess whether State would seek to prove one or all types of defined conduct
  • “assuming that the State did elect to allege each type of criminal conduct, the [defendant] would be put on notice that all types of delivery were going to be shown, or were possibly going to be shown, and he could prepare his defenses accordingly”
  • finding defendant may not be left to guess whether State would seek to prove one or all types of defined conduct
  • “[A]ssuming that the State did elect to allege each type of criminal conduct, the [defendant] would be put on notice that all types of delivery were going to be shown, or were possibly going to be shown, and he could prepare his defenses accordingly.”
  • State must allege which type of delivery it seeks to prove in face of motion to quash
  • State must allege which type of delivery it seeks to prove in face of motion to quash

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Roberts, Odom, Davis, Clinton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

143 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Ferguson v. State

293 other CourtListener records share this case name; the 50 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.