Skip to main content

Curry v. State

Citations

  • 1 S.W.3d 175
  • 1999 Tex. App. LEXIS 5668
  • 1999 WL 553701

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that the rules of appellate procedure in effect as of September 1, 1997, now provide that in criminal cases, we subject all errors constitutional or otherwise to an 25 appropriate harm analysis
  • conducting harm analysis without addressing applicability of Sodipo's automatic reversal doctrine to Article 28.10 error
  • conducting harm analysis without addressing applicability of Sodipo 's automatic reversal doctrine to Article 28.10 error
  • conducting harm analysis without addressing applicability of Sodipo's automatic reversal doctrine to Article 28.10 error

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Barajas, Larsen, McClure

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.