Skip to main content

Garcia v. State

Citations

  • 15 S.W.3d 533
  • 2000 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 38
  • 2000 WL 313482

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that in appeal of ruling on motion to suppress “[t]he determination of whether a statement is voluntary is a mixed question of law and fact, i.e., an application of law to a fact question”
  • holding there is no issue of a “cold” record if the appeal is abated to the same trial judge that made the initial findings
  • holding judge may believe or disbelieve all or any part of a 9 witness’s testimony
  • remanding for de novo suppression hearing and rejecting the written findings of a successor trial judge who did not preside over the original suppression hearing
  • dismissing dissenting opinion’s argument that the Court reach out and overrule Wicker v. State, 740 S.W.2d 779 (Tex. Crim. App. 1987), and explaining “[t]his court’s jurisdiction is limited to review of decisions by the courts of appeals.”
  • “[I]t is not appropriate for the second judge in the instant case to make findings of fact based solely on the written transcript of the initial hearing.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Johnson, Meyers, Price, Holland, Womack, McCormick, Keasler, Mansfield, Keller

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

93 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.