Skip to main content

Abbott v. State

Citations

  • 196 S.W.3d 334
  • 2006 WL 1550810

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that the jury could infer defendant’s intent to arouse or gratify his sexual desire from his act of touching child’s genitals
  • conducting a harm analysis under Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 44.2(a) after determining that the State's closing argument was improper where it misstated the law on the burden of proof
  • conducting a harm analysis under Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 44.2(a) after determining that the State’s closing argument was improper where it misstated the law on the burden of proof
  • “It is conceivable that a number of errors may be found harmful in their cumulative effect.”
  • jury could infer from defendant’s conduct in touching child’s genitals that it was done with intent to arouse and gratify his sexual desire
  • jury could infer from defendant’s conduct of touching child's genitals that it was done with the intent to arouse and gratify his sexual desire

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gray, Vance, Reyna

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

94 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

57 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.