Skip to main content

Curry v. State

Citations

  • 910 S.W.2d 490
  • 1995 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 119
  • 1995 WL 688920

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that complaint of cruel and unusual punishment is waived if not raised in trial court
  • holding that the constitutional right to be free from cruel and unusual punishment may be waived
  • holding that the constitutionality of a statute as applied to the appellant must be raised in the trial court to preserve the complaint for review
  • holding that a defendant must properly preserve a constitutional “as applied” challenge in the trial court for appellate review
  • holding that the appellant failed to preserve error because he “never objected at trial concerning cruel and unusual punishment”
  • holding that Eighth Amendment issues are subject to the 9 error preservation rule and are forfeited if not raised in the trial court

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Overstreet, Baird, Clinton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

630 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

26 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.