Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 12/3/1986

Mays v. State

Citations

726 S.W.2d 937
1986 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 901

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that officer = s conduct in handcuffing two men did not constitute arrest and was reasonable under circumstances as investigative detention
holding that officer's conduct in handcuffing two men did not constitute arrest and was reasonable under circumstances as investigative detention
holding that officer=s conduct in handcuffing two men did not constitute arrest and was reasonable under circumstances as investigative detention
holding that officer had reasonable suspicion to handcuff and detain two men, on the grounds of officer safety, after he responded to a burglary call alone and both men were larger than he and were suspected of burglary
holding officer = s handcuffing of two suspects for his own safety did not at that point, under the circumstances, constitute an arrest
involving an officer who handcuffed two men during a 7 frisk for the officer’s protection

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Tom G. Davis

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

148 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

49 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.