Skip to main content

Curry v. State

Citations

  • 792 P.2d 396
  • 106 Nev. 317
  • 1990 Nev. LEXIS 49
  • 1990 WL 65707

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that general intent crimes, like voluntary manslaughter, are inconsistent with the specific intent required for a criminal attempt
  • holding that general intent crime of voluntary manslaughter is incompatible with specific intent required for criminal attempt, and stating that “attempted voluntary manslaughter is therefore an illogical illusion”
  • holding that attempted voluntary manslaughter is not a crime in Nevada because attempt is a specific intent crime and one cannot logically commit voluntary manslaughter with a specific intent
  • explaining that “voluntary manslaughter is a general intent crime”
  • “One cannot logically specifically intend to act pursuant to a spontaneous, unanticipated, and therefore, truly irresistible passion”; voluntary manslaughter general intent crime; thus attempted voluntary manslaughter cannot exist.
  • holding that attempted voluntary manslaughter is not a crime in Nevada because attempt is a specific intent crime, and one cannot logically commit voluntary manslaughter with a specific intent

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.