Skip to main content

Curry v. State

Citations

  • 1 So. 3d 394
  • 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 1002
  • 2009 WL 295091

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding failure to hold Richardson hearing was reversible error where State did not disclose substance of -witness’s “surprise” testimony
  • “Richardson mandates that once a discovery violation is revealed, the trial court must conduct an inquiry to determine the sanctions that should be imposed on the violating party.” (quoting Snelgrove v. State, 921 So.2d 560, 567 (Fla.2005))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Padovano, Kahn, Van Nortwick

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.