Skip to main content

Blake v. State

Citations

  • 971 S.W.2d 451
  • 1998 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 80
  • 1998 WL 331386

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that performance of counsel must be evaluated in light of what was known to counsel at time of trial and not in hindsight
  • holding that a person is not an accomplice merely because he knows about the crime and fails to disclose it, or even tries to conceal the crime
  • observing that rule reflects legislative determination to view accomplice testimony with caution because accomplices often have incentives to lie to avoid punishment or shift blame
  • noting that Court has “repeatedly stated” that person is an accomplice “if he or she could be prosecuted for the same offense as the defendant, or a lesser included offense”
  • acknowledging that it has been within the province of the jury to assess the credibility of accomplice witness testimony for more than one hundred years
  • observing that rule reflects legislative determination to view accomplice testimony with caution because accomplices often have incentives to lie to avoid punishment or shift blame

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Baird, Holland, Keller, Mansfield, MeCORMICK, Meyers, Overstreet, Price, Womack

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

282 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

61 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Blake v. State

127 other CourtListener records share this case name; the 50 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.