Skip to main content

Smith v. State

Citations

  • 332 S.W.3d 425
  • 2011 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 156
  • 2011 WL 309654

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding “[a] person is not an accomplice if the person knew about the offense and failed to disclose it or helped the accused conceal it”
  • reiterating that evidence an accused was near, or at, the scene of the crime at or about the time the crime was committed may tend to connect the accused to the crime, when coupled with other suspicious circumstances
  • accomplice’s testimony cannot be corroborated by prior statements made by accomplice witness to third person
  • “When the evidence clearly shows . . . that a witness is an accomplice as a matter of law, the trial judge must instruct the jury accordingly.”
  • witness indicted for same offense as accused is accomplice as matter of law
  • “[I]t is not appropriate for appellate courts to independently construe non[]accomplice evidence.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Keasler, Keller, Meyers, Price, Womack, Hervey, Cochran, Johnson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

299 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.