Wincott v. State of Texas

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that defendant's actions asserting his innocence and requesting accomplice to admit he was lying did not indicate consciousness of guilt
• holding that defendant’s actions asserting his innocence and requesting accomplice to admit he was lying did not indicate consciousness of guilt
• holding that defendant’s actions asserting his innocence and requesting accomplice to admit he was lying did not indicate consciousness of guilt
• holding that defendant's actions asserting his innocence and requesting accomplice to admit he was lying did not indicate consciousness of guilt
• worried behavior of appellant after arrest of accomplice and written correspondence referencing “the crimes” insufficient to corroborate appellant’s involvement in series of armed robberies

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).