Blake v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• Stating that the “clearly erroneous” standard of review is applicable to the circuit court’s finding of facts
• Stating that the \clearly erroneous\ standard of review is applicable to the circuit court's finding of facts
• “[A] remand for further proceedings was required as a result of the State’s 28 insufficient response to [a]ppellant’s petition[.]”
• “[A] remand for further proceedings was required as a result of the State’s 28 insufficient response to [a]ppellant’s petition[.]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Gutierrez v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2011-11-29· cited 25×
• Washington v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2012-02-21· cited 17×
• Simms v. Shearin, Warden
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2015-02-24· cited 9×
• Arey v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2011-09-22· cited 8×
• Simms v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2015-11-23· cited 4×
• Satterfield v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2023-09-05· cited 4×
• Johnson v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2014-11-21· cited 1×
• Satterfield v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2023-04-24

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Blake v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2006-10-24· cited 82×
• Arey v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2007-08-01· cited 31×