Supreme Court of Delaware· 7/22/2010
Blake v. State
Citations
- 3 A.3d 1077
- 2010 Del. LEXIS 351
- 2010 WL 2873823
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that “[t]his Court has consistently and unequivocally held a witness' statement may be introduced only if the two-part foundation is first established.”
- discussing “[t]he foundation requirement that the witness indicate whether or not the prior statement is true. . .”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Steele, Holland, Berger, Jacobs, Ridgely
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
9 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Collins v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 2012-11-15· cited 17×
- Richardson v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 2012-05-14· cited 13×
- Gomez v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 2011-07-28· cited 13×
- State v. FlowersSupreme Court of Delaware· 2016-10-21· cited 13×
- Holland v. PierceD. Delaware· 2015-06-11· cited 2×
- State of Delaware v. Flowers.Superior Court of Delaware· 2015-04-23
- State v. RomeoSuperior Court of Delaware· 2019-02-21
- Wing v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 2024-08-13
- Berry v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 2025-09-15
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.