Skip to main content

Blake v. State

Citations

  • 807 So. 2d 772
  • 2002 WL 236126

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that, where defendant was out on bond in two cases when he was arrested in a third case he was not entitled to jail credit on the sentences imposed in the first two cases unless his bond had been revoked
  • holding that jail credit issues can be raised in a rule 3.850 motion “ ‘if the defendant is requesting additional jail credit due to factual matters not ascertainable from the trial court’s records’ ” (quoting Thomas v. State, 611 So.2d 600, 601 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993))
  • noting that “a defendant ‘is only entitled to credit against each sentence for the time spent in jail for the charge which led to that sentence’ ” (quoting Keene v. State, 500 So.2d 592, 594 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986))
  • “Jail credit issues are appropriately brought in a rule 3.850 motion....”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Blue

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

22 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.