Supreme Court of Delaware· 4/29/2013
Blake v. State
Citations
- 65 A.3d 557
- 2013 WL 1801993
- 2013 Del. LEXIS 214
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Blake did not raise directly the issue of Double Jeopardy below, and the Superior Court did not address the issue on its own. Our standard of review is therefore plain error.”
- “Because the second prosecution for the greater offense subjected [the defendant] to double jeopardy, the [s]tate cannot avoid the protection the Double Jeopardy Clause provides by offering to vacate the lesser-included offense as consolation.”
- “Because the second prosecution for the greater offense subjected 13 [the defendant] to double jeopardy, the [s]tate cannot avoid the protection the Double 14 Jeopardy Clause provides by offering to vacate the lesser-included offense as 15 consolation.”
- “[T]he doctrine of plain error is limited to material defects which are apparent on the face of the record; which are basic, serious and fundamental in their character, and which clearly deprive an accused of a substantial right, or which clearly show manifest injustice”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Holland, Jacobs, Ridgely
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
14 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Ingram v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 2015-02-11
- Joseph C. Jackson v. State of DelawareSupreme Court of Delaware· 2015-07-23
- State v. MadrigalNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2015-07-28
- Jones v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 2015-11-10
- Turner v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 2015-11-09
- Restrepo-Duque v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 2015-12-17
- Lolley v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 2016-02-04
- Stokes v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 2021-03-26
- Franklin v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 2021-05-14
- State v. MadrigalNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2015-09-15
- Martin v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 2023-11-07
- In the Matter of the Petition of Robert Alley for a Writ of MandamusSupreme Court of Delaware· 2024-02-01
- Jewell v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 2025-03-31
- Fayton v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 2026-01-09
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court· 1969-06-23· cited 7,763×
- Brown v. OhioSupreme Court· 1977-06-16· cited 3,552×
- Green v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1957-12-16· cited 3,075×
- United States v. WilsonSupreme Court· 1975-02-25· cited 1,334×
- Wainwright v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 1986-02-21· cited 430×
- Blueford v. ArkansasSupreme Court· 2012-05-24· cited 148×
- Turner v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 2010-10-11· cited 51×
- Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 2002-05-09· cited 50×
- State v. WillisSuperior Court of Delaware· 1995-11-21· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.