Medina v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that any potential prejudice from a Crawford violation will be reviewed under a harmless-error analysis
• concluding that when State can show beyond a reasonable doubt that Confrontation Clause error did not contribute to the verdict, reversal is unnecessary
• concluding that when State can show beyond a reasonable doubt that Confrontation Clause error did not contribute to the verdict, reversal is unnecessary
• recognizing that court may consider the extent to which testimony is cumulative of other evidence and strength of the State’s case in determining whether its admission was harmless
• recognizing that court may consider the extent to which testimony is cumulative of other evidence and strength of the State's case in determining whether its admission was harmless
• holding that \hearsay statements are inadmissible. A statement is hearsay if it is offered in evidence to prove the truth of the matter asserted. Hearsay is inadmissible unless it falls within one of the exceptions to the general rule.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).