Skip to main content

Blake v. State

Citations

  • 612 S.E.2d 589
  • 272 Ga. App. 402
  • 2005 Fulton County D. Rep. 1026
  • 2005 Ga. App. LEXIS 291

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that the binding precedent of Anthony controlled the methodology and outcome of the case and applying count-by-count approach
  • concluding that the binding precedent of Anthony controlled the methodology and outcome of the case and applying count-by-count approach
  • noting that a majority of federal circuit courts of appeal reject the “count-by-count” approach of Anthony and instead consider whether the defendant’s sentence has been increased in the aggregate
  • Bernes, J., concurring specially, opining that count-by-count approach “sweeps too broadly” and advocating adoption of aggregate approach
  • Bernes, J., concurring specially, opining that count-by-count approach “requires the [Pearce] presumption to apply in situations where . . . actual vindictiveness is unlikely”
  • presumption of vindictiveness applies where trial court revoked probation of five-year sentence at resentencing

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Adams, Ruffin, Bernes

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

29 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.