Court of Appeals of Georgia· 3/23/2005
Blake v. State
Citations
- 612 S.E.2d 589
- 272 Ga. App. 402
- 2005 Fulton County D. Rep. 1026
- 2005 Ga. App. LEXIS 291
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that the binding precedent of Anthony controlled the methodology and outcome of the case and applying count-by-count approach
- concluding that the binding precedent of Anthony controlled the methodology and outcome of the case and applying count-by-count approach
- noting that a majority of federal circuit courts of appeal reject the “count-by-count” approach of Anthony and instead consider whether the defendant’s sentence has been increased in the aggregate
- Bernes, J., concurring specially, opining that count-by-count approach “sweeps too broadly” and advocating adoption of aggregate approach
- Bernes, J., concurring specially, opining that count-by-count approach “requires the [Pearce] presumption to apply in situations where . . . actual vindictiveness is unlikely”
- presumption of vindictiveness applies where trial court revoked probation of five-year sentence at resentencing
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Adams, Ruffin, Bernes
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
9 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. HudsonSupreme Court of Georgia· 2013-09-23· cited 56×
- State v. WadeSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2010-07-06· cited 29×
- Adams v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2010-07-12· cited 18×
- Adams v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2009-07-13· cited 14×
- Schlanger v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2009-05-12· cited 5×
- Hawes v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2009-06-18· cited 4×
- Hudson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2012-10-17· cited 3×
- Hillis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2010-03-26· cited 1×
- Claude Hudson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2012-10-17
Cites
29 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court· 1969-06-23· cited 7,763×
- Alabama v. SmithSupreme Court· 1989-06-12· cited 1,589×
- Chaffin v. StynchcombeSupreme Court· 1973-05-21· cited 874×
- Wasman v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1984-07-03· cited 595×
- Texas v. McCulloughSupreme Court· 1986-02-26· cited 534×
- United States v. Charles ShueSeventh Circuit· 1987-06-30· cited 224×
- United States v. Juan Pimienta-Redondo, United States of America v. Alfredo PupoFirst Circuit· 1989-04-28· cited 208×
- United States v. CampbellFifth Circuit· 1997-02-07· cited 162×
- United States v. James R. Monaco and Eugene O. HicksEleventh Circuit· 1983-04-06· cited 70×
- United States v. Linwood Gray, United States of America v. Harry L. StaleyFourth Circuit· 1988-07-27· cited 69×
- Inman v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1971-07-08· cited 61×
- United States v. Thaeeb BayNinth Circuit· 1987-07-07· cited 48×
- United States v. Lewis MarkusSecond Circuit· 1979-08-03· cited 47×
- Ronald Kelly v. E. Calvin Neubert, Administrator, and W. Carey Edwards, the Attorney General of the State of New JerseyThird Circuit· 1990-03-14· cited 44×
- United States v. Russell Sullivan, United States of America v. Mary Ann SullivanTenth Circuit· 1992-06-12· cited 41×
- Edward Paul v. United StatesFifth Circuit· 1984-06-25· cited 39×
- Anthony v. HopperSupreme Court of Georgia· 1975-09-16· cited 32×
- Phillips v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2002-10-15· cited 32×
- United States v. Bruno MancariSeventh Circuit· 1990-10-04· cited 29×
- Thompson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1980-04-30· cited 29×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.