Nevada Supreme Court· 10/20/2005

Blake v. State

Citations

121 P.3d 567
121 Nev. 779
121 Nev. Adv. Rep. 77
2005 Nev. LEXIS 93

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

recognizing that \the district court enjoys broad discretion in ruling on challenges for cause\ because \such rulings involve factual determinations\
holding that the requirements of Pet rocelli do not apply where the evidence was not admitted pursuant to NRS 48.045(2)
concluding that appellant not denied right to impartial jury so long as \the jury actually seated [was] impartial\
concluding that appellant not denied right to impartial jury so long as “the jury actually seated [was] impartial”
recognizing that the right to an impartial jury is not violated unless a juror empaneled was unfair or biased
holding that an instruction providing that \Nile Defendant is presumed innocent until the contrary is proved\ was not erroneous because it \plainly contemplated that guilt might not be proven\ (emphasis added) (internal quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gibbons, Becker, Rose, Maupin, Douglas, Parraguirre, Hardesty

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

41 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

39 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.