District Court of Appeal of Florida· 10/6/2006
Blake v. State
Citations
- 939 So. 2d 192
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing that police commands may constitute seizure under some circumstances, yet also recognizing that police encounters to determine individual’s identity and address—goal of police in present case—is not unlawful seizure
- nothing more than consensual encounter occurred when officer illuminated his spotlight to see individuals sitting in vehicle and defendant subsequently exited vehicle
- ‘‘[i]f . . . the officer phrases his or her inquiries as commands, this action would indicate that the individual was not free to leave’’
- [i]f . . . the officer phrases his or her inquiries as commands, this action would indicate that the individual was not free to leave
- “Officers may during consensual encounters ask for names and addresses, inquire about the defendant’s business, or request a consent to search.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Monaco
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
12 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Robinson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-03-28· cited 9×
- State v. GoodwinDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-06-09· cited 8×
- LEROY v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-06-02· cited 7×
- P.W. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-09-19· cited 7×
- State v. JenningsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-11-21· cited 6×
- State v. TullisDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-12-28· cited 2×
- PW v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-09-19
- Ellis v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-06-10
- State v. EdmondsSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2016-09-13
- State v. Jordan C. BeansDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2017-03-31
- STATE OF FLORIDA v. SEBASTION TIGNERDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2019-07-24
- State v. MarcianoConnecticut Appellate Court· 2025-03-18
Cites
38 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court· 1968-06-10· cited 37,942×
- Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court· 1983-03-23· cited 6,728×
- Popple v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1993-10-14· cited 417×
- Doorbal v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2003-01-30· cited 122×
- San Martin v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1998-06-11· cited 109×
- Hines v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-07-15· cited 46×
- State v. KindleDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-04-12· cited 37×
- McMaster v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-03-30· cited 36×
- Hrezo v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-01-31· cited 34×
- Young v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-01-04· cited 32×
- State v. BaezSupreme Court of Florida· 2004-11-10· cited 28×
- State v. T.T.District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-02-28· cited 23×
- Dewberry v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-06-24· cited 22×
- Errickson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-10-08· cited 19×
- State v. MitchellDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1994-06-15· cited 17×
- Tate v. McDonoughSupreme Court of Florida· 2006-07-06· cited 17×
- State v. WellsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1987-12-03· cited 17×
- State v. PooleDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-03-10· cited 17×
- Houston v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-03-31· cited 16×
- Siplin v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-09-05· cited 15×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.