United States v. Herbert Sperling

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reversing where testimony was not corroborated, affirming where testimony was corroborated by substantial independent testimony
• reversing where testimony was not corroborated, affirming where testimony was corroborated
• disapproving of Pinkerton instruction where evidence of substantive acts was great, but the evidence of a conspiracy linking them together was weak, because those \circumstances [are] quite different from those that gave [Pinkerton] birth\
• Sperling convicted of separate substantive, conspiracy, and section 848 offenses

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).