Second Circuit· 7/31/1964
United States v. Borelli
Citations
- 336 F.2d 376
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that although incarceration for a crime unrelated to the charged conspiracy does not entitle defendant to a directed verdict on withdrawal, \the fact [of incarceration] ... raise[s] a question for the jury on the issue of ... withdrawal\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Friendly
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
231 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court· 1978-06-29· cited 1,267×
- State v. LobatoSupreme Court of Louisiana· 1992-07-01· cited 945×
- Anderson v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1974-06-03· cited 571×
- United States v. DelgadoFifth Circuit· 2012-02-22· cited 408×
- Watts v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1976-07-28· cited 398×
- United States v. BoylanFirst Circuit· 1990-03-14· cited 393×
- United States v. Mason Townsend, Luis E. Diaz, Orlando Nunez, Dorothy Taylor, Carlos Mejia, Joseph Angel Claudio, and Isabel MarquezSeventh Circuit· 1991-02-14· cited 392×
- United States v. SalamehSecond Circuit· 1998-08-04· cited 359×
- United States v. Carmine TramuntiSecond Circuit· 1975-03-07· cited 336×
- United States v. Roy B. Kelly, Cecil v. Hagen and Milton J. ShuckSecond Circuit· 1965-07-29· cited 287×
- United States v. VarelliSeventh Circuit· 1969-02-11· cited 268×
- United States v. Dennis Geaney and Vincent Russell LynchSecond Circuit· 1969-11-06· cited 257×
- United States v. EvansTenth Circuit· 1992-06-30· cited 245×
- United States v. Charles T. Bennett, Wilbert Haywood, Elmer Jessup, Henry Stanton and Farris ThomasSecond Circuit· 1969-02-26· cited 244×
- United States v. Mayo Perez, DefendantsappellantsFifth Circuit· 1974-01-02· cited 233×
- United States v. Herbert SperlingSecond Circuit· 1975-03-03· cited 225×
- United States v. Enrico Campanale and Donald Matthews, United States of America v. Mike GrancichNinth Circuit· 1975-09-02· cited 222×
- United States v. Joseph CalabroSecond Circuit· 1972-09-21· cited 215×
- United States v. TerrySecond Circuit· 1983-02-18· cited 210×
- United States v. Joseph Pace, Anthony Besase, Christ Savides, Donald Smith, John Cialoni, and Robert WilsonSeventh Circuit· 1990-03-15· cited 206×
Cites
75 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1946-06-10· cited 7,845×
- Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1935-04-15· cited 4,581×
- Pinkerton v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1946-10-14· cited 3,200×
- Costello v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1956-04-01· cited 1,814×
- Krulewitch v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1949-03-28· cited 1,293×
- Dennis v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1951-06-04· cited 1,230×
- Grunewald v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1957-05-27· cited 1,102×
- Hyde v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1912-06-10· cited 844×
- Palermo v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1959-10-12· cited 766×
- Blumenthal v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1948-01-05· cited 757×
- United States v. PeoniSecond Circuit· 1938-12-12· cited 651×
- Maggio v. ZeitzSupreme Court· 1948-02-09· cited 646×
- Fiswick v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1946-12-09· cited 506×
- United States v. FalconeSupreme Court· 1940-12-09· cited 436×
- Bruno v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1939-12-04· cited 408×
- United States v. DennisSecond Circuit· 1950-10-23· cited 395×
- Paul John Carbo, Frank Palermo, Joseph Sica, Louis Tom Dragna, and Truman K. Gibson, Jr. v. United StatesNinth Circuit· 1963-03-19· cited 393×
- United States v. William BentvenaSecond Circuit· 1963-06-13· cited 339×
- United States v. AgueciSecond Circuit· 1962-11-08· cited 268×
- Rosenberg v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1959-06-22· cited 255×
Other cases named United States v. Borelli
2 other CourtListener records share this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.