United States v. Alphonse Sisca

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• both Sisca and Kirk affirmed § 843(b) convictions where the underlying felony was conspiracy under § 846; neither discussed the question presented here
• defendant failed to raise minimization issue in a pretrial motion notwithstanding that he was well aware of the factual basis for a motion to suppress for failure to minimize
• evidence of defendant's position in the distribution network, the substantial sums of money changing hands and substantial anticipated profit was sufficient for jury to find substantial income derived from enterprise

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).