United States v. George Stofsky

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing possibility that new evidence regarding credibility of witness may warrant new trial
• recognizing possibility that new evidence regarding credibility of witness may warrant new trial
• affirming conviction where alleged perjury was not sufficiently significant to have “unfairly tainted” verdict
• recognizing § 918.14(1), (2) in attorney discipline context
• “We do not employ the omniscience of a Monday morning quarterback as the standard for determining what investigation should have been made by the government.”
• \We do not employ the omniscience of a Monday morning quarterback as the standard for determining what investigation should have been made by the government.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).