United States v. James Vincent Keogh

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that once a request for production is made, the “prosecution knows of the defense’s interest and, if it has failed to honor this even in good faith, it has only itself to blame.”
• noting that were courts to grant coram nobis relief frequently, such petitions would be much more common
• “We do not, however, automatically require a new trial whenever ‘a combing of the prosecutors’ files after the trial has disclosed evidence possibly useful to the defense but not likely to have changed the verdict ....’
• admittedly a \no request\ case

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).