United States v. Edward Mapp, A/K/A Sonny Woods

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing in a criminal context that under “general legal waiver principles” the waiver of a constitutionally protected right must be “knowing and voluntary”
• recognizing in a criminal context that under \general legal waiver principles\ the waiver of a constitutionally protected right must be \knowing and voluntary\
• listing then-recognized exceptions to warrant requirement: (i) hot pursuit; (ii) plain-view doctrine; (iii) emergency situation; (iv) automobile search; (v) consent; and (vi) incident to arrest
• listing then-recognized exceptions to warrant requirement: (i) hot pursuit; (ii) plain-view doctrine; (iii) emergency situation; (iv) automobile search; (v) consent; and (vi) incident to arrest
• noting further that officer’s statement was fairly construed as demand for particular piece of incriminating evidence rather than solicitation of consent to search for that item
• finding coercion when officer entered defendant’s bedroom with a gun in hand, announced that she was under arrest, and said “[w]e want the package” (internal quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).