United States v. Jesus Losada and Rosalinda Losada

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “[a]lthough the statute does not define ‘continuing series of violations,’ courts have required that there be a minimum of three” (collecting cases)
• substantial income language “clearly was intended to exclude trivial amounts derived from occasional drug sales”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).