United States v. Mario Biaggi, Stanley Simon, Richard Biaggi, Peter Neglia, John Mariotta, and Bernard Ehrlich

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that disparity of two blacks and two to three Hispanics in a fifty- to sixty-person venire comports with the fair-cross-section requirement
• holding that addition of two blacks and two Hispanics to achieve perfect parity did not violate Sixth Amendment’s fair .cross-section requirement
• expressing doubt whether Castaneda meant to require that selection procedure not be racially neutral in order to make prima facie case
• vacatur of federal bribery offenses required reversal of RICO convictions, notwithstanding the jury’s finding of two other predicate acts of mail fraud
• failure to add two Blacks and two or three Hispanies to venire of 60 not violative of Constitution
• bribery and accepting a gratuity, though two separate criminal offenses, constituted one predicate act because they were both based on the same conduct: a promise of future employment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).