United States v. Arthur Tortorello

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• federal prosecution for securities fraud based on state wiretaps permissible where the state offense of grand larceny encompassed federal offense of securities fraud
• which does not refer to Eighth Circuit opinion in United States v. Cox, supra
• “[S]ince the identity of all persons who may contact or be contacted by the suspect usually cannot be known, it is permissible to record pertinent conversations involving parties not named in the interception order.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).