Federal Case

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating \it is axiomatic of the double jeopardy clause that jeopardy attached once [defendant's] guilty plea was accepted\
• admitting secondary evidence where a witness testified that the original document was either given to the opponent or lost
• stating “it is axiomatic of the double jeopardy clause that jeopardy attached once [the defendant’s] guilty plea was accepted”
• stating “it is axiomatic of the double jeopardy clause that jeopardy attached once [the defendant’s] guilty plea was accepted”
• admitting secondary evidence where a witness testified that the original document was either given to the opponent or lost
• finding no ʺclear abuse of discretion to qualify [an Spanish‐language interpreter] as an expertʺ

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).