United States v. Harold v. Gleason, Paul Luftig and J. Michael Carter

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that Rule 16 disclosure obligation was 14 satisfied by making evidence available to the defendant prior to trial
• holding, where there is a \lack of merit\ as to claims 11 asserted in complaint, district court does not err in denying motion for default judgment
• finding that special credibility instructions are appropriate when “accomplices or coconspirators, those who have made plea bargains or are awaiting sentence, those who have been granted immunity, and defendants” testify for the government (citations omitted)
• explaining that materiality is the same in the civil and criminal contexts
• noting that federal criminal provisions “provide no basis for civil liability”
• finding that criminal provisions provide no basis for civil liability

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).