Skip to main content

Armstrong v. State

Citations

  • 718 S.W.2d 686
  • 1985 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1741

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that relevant circumstances have included length of detention, incommunicado or prolonged interrogation, refusing request to telephone lawyer or friend, and physical brutality
  • holding that, without a timely and specific objection to the admission of evidence during trial, any error in admitting the evidence is waived
  • describing relevant factors in determining whether a defendant’s will was overborne during questioning
  • Without a timely and specific objection to the admission of evidence during trial, any error in admitting the evidence is waived
  • overruled on other grounds by Mosely v. State, 983 S.W.2d 249, 264 n.18 (Tex. Crim. App. 1998
  • overruled on other grounds by Mosely v. State , 983 S.W.2d 249, 264 n.18 (Tex. Crim. App. 1998). [18] Delao v. State, 235 S.W.3d 235, 241 (Tex. Crim. App. 2007) cert. denied , 128 S. Ct. 1128 (2008); Penry v. State , 903 S.W.2d 715, 744 (Tex. Crim. App.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Davis, Teague, Miller, Campbell, White

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

133 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

35 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.