Skip to main content

Butler v. State

Citations

  • 769 S.W.2d 234
  • 1989 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 63
  • 1989 WL 30515

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that “no evidence” standard for legal-sufficiency review was “expressly forbidden” by United States Supreme Court by Jackson v. Virginia
  • holding that intent to steal was inferable from the fact that defendant entered a cab, executed the driver, and ransacked the pocket of the decedent
  • holding that error in the admission of evidence is cured when the evidence is later admitted without objection
  • likening the “any evidence'' test to a no-evidence rule that “differs not at all from” the Thompson standard abandoned in Jackson
  • likening the “any evidence” test to a no-evidence rule that “differs not at all from” the Thompson standard abandoned in Jackson
  • rejecting language that evidence is sufficient A if there is any evidence which, if believed, shows the guilt of the accused @ as inconsistent with Jackson and constitutionally impermissable

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Miller, Campbell, Clinton, White, McCormick

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

530 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Butler v. State

659 other CourtListener records share this case name; the 50 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.