Skip to main content

Taylor v. State

Citations

  • 995 S.W.2d 78
  • 1999 Tenn. LEXIS 324
  • 1999 WL 401653

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a sentence is only illegal if it is in direct contravention of a statute at the time it is imposed
  • observing that a voidable judgment is one that is “facially valid and requires the introduction of proof beyond the face of the record or judgment to establish its invalidity”
  • holding habeas corpus is only available to challenge a void or expired sentence
  • noting the availability of post-conviction proceedings “to collaterally attack a conviction and sentence which have become final”
  • providing a detailed chronology of the legislative and judicial actions that culminated in our supreme court’s decision in Miller
  • noting the availability of habeas corpus and post- conviction to collaterally attack a conviction or sentence that has become final

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Anderson, Barker, Birch, Drowota, Holder

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

814 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

35 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Taylor v. State

1,937 other CourtListener records share this case name; the 50 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.